On Tuesday, December 13, 2016, the Tahiti Assembly approved a bill regulating professional activities related to the production and marketing of pearl and mother-of-pearl products in French Polynesia. The reform sparked intense debate among assembly members, who expressed divergent views on the legislation’s potential impact on the pearl industry.
Political Divide on Reform
The discussions were largely dominated by the Rassemblement pour une majorité autonomiste (RMA) group, which backed the bill. Charles Fong Loi, a representative of the group, praised the initiative as addressing the sector’s current crisis. He emphasized lagoon protection measures and the creation of advisory committees to empower local stakeholders, calling the reform “essential for the long-term viability of Polynesian pearl farming.”
In contrast, the Tahoera’a huiraatira group expressed reservations, supporting certain provisions while raising concerns. Monique Richeton of the orange party criticized the elimination of systematic pearl inspections, arguing this could undermine product traceability and sector competitiveness. She contended the government appeared to be restricting pearl trade—a point that fueled heated exchanges.
Regulatory Concerns and Defense
The Competition Authority reiterated earlier warnings about potential market distortions. However, Teva Rohfritsch, Minister of the Blue Economy, staunchly defended the reform, stating it aimed to “balance production control with sector-wide support.”
Outcome and Implications
After two hours of debate, the bill passed with 29 votes in favor, 14 against, and 10 abstentions. Despite objections, the reform clears the way for stricter, more transparent regulation of French Polynesia’s pearl industry—a sector accounting for 70% of local exports and 1,300+ jobs.
Leave a Reply